Risk-informed audit programme and criteria
Define the boundary and intended outcome for this part of the engagement.
SUPPORT SERVICE / MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Support for planning and conducting impartial internal audits to evaluate whether management-system arrangements conform to defined criteria and are effectively implemented.
01 / Service overview
Define the boundary and intended outcome for this part of the engagement.
Connect the activity to the organisation's actual processes and applicable requirements.
Turn observations into practical actions that can be owned and reviewed.
Support for planning and conducting impartial internal audits to evaluate whether management-system arrangements conform to defined criteria and are effectively implemented. The exact scope, deliverables, responsibilities and timing should be agreed after understanding the organisation’s context and intended outcomes.
The engagement should be proportionate to the organisation's context, selected framework, activities and available resources. Scope, deliverables and responsibilities are agreed before work begins.
02 / What this support can address
The areas below help frame the engagement. Exact activities depend on the agreed scope, organisational context and evidence available.
Assess selected processes against defined audit criteria.
Record observations supported by relevant evidence and sampling.
Identify conformity, nonconformity and opportunities for improvement.
Support action ownership and review of corrective-action effectiveness.
03 / Typical engagement
A typical sequence is outlined here. Activities, timing and deliverables are tailored and confirmed for each engagement.
Define audit criteria, scope, frequency, methods and responsibilities using a risk-informed programme.
Prepare audit plans and checklists that follow processes and relevant requirements rather than only document titles.
Gather objective evidence through interviews, observation and review of records.
Record findings clearly, communicate results and support appropriate corrective-action follow-up.
Review closure evidence and effectiveness as appropriate, maintaining auditor impartiality.
04 / Scope and responsibilities
Internal audits are part of the organisation's own system evaluation. Audit objectivity, competence, impartiality and independence from the activity being audited should be considered. Consultancy support does not replace independent certification audits.
Any applicable certification, accreditation, validation or verification decision remains with the relevant independent body. The organisation remains accountable for its own management system and operational decisions.
05 / Frequently asked questions
Answers to common questions about the scope and practical use of this support service.
Many management-system standards include internal-audit requirements. Check the applicable standard and scope.
Audit arrangements should protect objectivity and impartiality. Auditing one's own work may compromise this.
It commonly records scope, criteria, methods, evidence, findings and conclusions.
No. It is one part of system evaluation and does not replace an independent certification audit.
DISCUSS THE SCOPE
Review the standards catalogue or discuss the support required for your management system.